





 |
|
Philosophy
& Methodology
Problems
and Possible Solutions
Five Underlying Beliefs of Communities Working
Together
Problems
and Possible Solutions
Groups,
organizations, institutions and communities of all types have a common
interest in improving how they function in order to more effectively meet
the needs of their individual members. In their efforts to serve their
membership, they face many barriers that must be overcome in order to
be successful—often including a lack of understanding of the barriers
themselves. CWT believes that some of the most important factors that
create these barriers are:
- Inadequate understanding
of the points of view of all who are involved
- Lack of a commonly
understood and shared vision
- Inadequate involvement
of members in decision making
- Inefficient use
of the resources that are available
- Inability to think
creatively about new ways to solve problems and work together
Problems
such as these are difficult--and often impossible--to overcome unless
specific actions are taken to change the ways that people interact and
work together. Fortunately, there are numerous skills, insights and methodologies
that can be used to transform organizational and community behavior. During
the past couple of decades, many different people have developed effective
dialogue and conflict resolution techniques that can help address the
barriers mentioned above. All of these approaches have in common a belief
that even small shifts in the way that people communicate and approach
their problems can help create significant breakthroughs in how they work
together.
Communities
Working Together utilizes a variety of proven dialogue and conflict resolution
methods to address and help solve the wide range of problems that groups,
organizations and government agencies must confront. Depending on the
situation, we may:
- Teach an organization
how to use facilitated dialogue to work through a sensitive problem
- Intervene directly
and conduct a mediation with all of the relevant parties in a dispute
- Conduct
a workshop or a retreat that allows staff members to get beyond a conflict
and begin to work together effectively
- Train
facilitators so that an organization or community can made the effective
use of dialogue a regular part of their work
- Design
and help organize a large outreach project that engages an organization’s
constituency or the general public in thoughtful deliberation and planning
about what to do on a controversial issue.
In
light of the problems that groups, organizations, and institutions face
and our faith in the power of dialogue and conflict transformation, Communities
Working Together has developed some underlying beliefs that give direction
and guidance to our work.
Five
Underlying Beliefs of Communities Working Together
- We believe that
people and institutions can move their functioning to a higher level
by improving the quality of conversation they have about their collective
concerns.
- We believe that
the best way to make good decisions about the direction of organizations
and communities is to find credible and efficient mechanisms for soliciting
the perspective/input of a wide cross-section of employees and/or citizens.
- We believe that
the vast majority of conflicts within organizations and communities
are not caused by people who have bad intentions or even different goals.
Rather, most conflicts emerge because people have somewhat differing
(though not necessarily opposing) definitions of a problem and/or different
visions of the best path to commonly held goals.
- We believe that
a common problem for organizations and particularly for communities
is the prevailing conception of what constitutes a public meeting. We
have found that people are all too often stuck in a model of public
meetings in which hundreds may attend, but only a very small number
voices are actually heard.
- We believe that,
by employing the technique of small group dialogue and conflict resolution,
public meetings can a) engage more individuals in a deeper way, b) create
a much greater sense of community, and c) elicit much more and better
information that can be used in the decision-making process.
|
 |